Keywords
How to Cite
Accepted 2024-11-20
Published 2025-02-16
Abstract
刑讯逼供在学术概念上是指，司法人员对犯罪嫌疑人、被告人使用肉刑或变相肉刑，逼取口供的一种违法行为。是被我国刑法所禁止的一种违法行为。是司法公正环节造成众多冤屈案件的根源，也是法治社会刑事诉讼最棘手的硬骨头。由于多方面原因因素的共同作用导致，刑讯逼供一直存在于各个时代和社会发展中，因此对刑讯逼供及其现实对策进行深入地探究与研讨，完善相关法律法规，对促进我国新时代法治社会建设具有重要的意义与深远影响。本文是通过从刑讯逼供的概述，刑讯逼供产生的原因，刑讯逼供解决的现实对策三个方面来论述，意在通过探讨刑讯逼供概述，综合系统分析其产生的原因以及对于刑讯逼供的现实存在情况给予相关解决策略。同时，刑讯逼供的解决策略也是本文的重点，将着重论述该方面的内容。
References
Cao W A. (2005). Legislative Improvement of the crime of extorting confessions by torture. Public Security Research (05), 34-39.
Lu Ping, Zhang Huizhong.(2000). A new explanation of the causes and countermeasures of extorting confessions by torture. People's Procuratorate (10), 14-19.
Chen X L.(2005). The formation of wrong cases. Journal of Public Security. Journal of Zhejiang Public Security College (05), 14-15.
Wang W G. (2012). Causes and Prevention of extorting Confessions by Torture (Master's Thesis, Shandong University). Master of
Ma Yaling.(2010). On the application of the principle of presumption of innocence in China's criminal procedure practice. Journal of Theory (07), 70-72.
Sun Changyong.(2000). The right to Silence and Criminal Procedure in China. Modern Jurisprudence (02), 18-23.
Yang L. (2000). On the quality composition of judicial personnel. Journal of Chongqing College of 87 International Theory and Practice in Humanities and Social Sciences | www.wisvora.com
[在此处键入]
Commerce (02), 66-68.
Ma Yaling.(2010). On the application of the principle of presumption of innocence in China's criminal procedure practice. Journal of Theory (07), 70-72.
Chen Weidong.(2007). Establishing exclusionary rules of illegal evidence to curb extortion by torture. People's Prosecution (23), 9.
Wu Hongyao.(2014). Rules and Effectiveness of Exclusionary rule of Illegal evidence -- On the improvement of exclusionary rule of illegal evidence in China. Modern Jurisprudence (04), 121-130. Wu Danhong.(2006). An empirical study on the exclusionary rule of illegal evidence: A case study of the court handling the defense of forced confession by torture. Modern Jurisprudence (05), 143-149.
Wang Xiaoqing.(2017). A probe into the application of the exclusion rule of illegal evidence in China: Based on an empirical study of 50 cases of extorting confessions by torture. Journal of Economic Research (01), 195-199.
Tang Xiaotian.(2000). Establishing the right to silence system in line with China's national conditions. Journal of Shanghai Administrative Cadre Institute of Political Science and Law (02), 31-37.
Jin X K. (2005). On the construction of the Presence System of Lawyers in Investigation Interrogation in China (Master's degree Thesis, China University of Political Science and Law).
Bian Jianlin， Li Jing.(2012). Perfection and improvement of legal supervision system in Criminal procedure. Journal of the National Academy of Prosecutors (03), 45-51.
Yang Xiaoning.(2012). On the procuratorial supervision mechanism of extorting confessions by torture. Chinese Journal of Criminal Law (04), 83-92.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Sshuaijie Wang (Author)