The Legal Basis for the Expansion of the Effectiveness of Arbitration Agreements: Taking Principal and Guarantee Contracts as Examples
pdf

Keywords

Principal Contract
Guarantee Contract
Arbitration Agreement
Expansion of Effectiveness
Jurisprudential Basis

How to Cite

Ma, Y. (2025). The Legal Basis for the Expansion of the Effectiveness of Arbitration Agreements: Taking Principal and Guarantee Contracts as Examples. International Theory and Practice in Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(1), 315–325. https://doi.org/10.70693/itphss.v2i1.178
Received 2024-11-17
Accepted 2024-11-21
Published 2025-01-04

Abstract

The determination of the validity of arbitration agreements is fundamentally connected to principles of contract law. Traditional contract law doctrines, such as "party autonomy" and "privity of contract" often serve as pivotal references in this determination process. The introduction of the Draft Amendment to the Arbitration Law of the People's Republic of China, which extends the arbitration agreement in a principal contract to ancillary contracts, is of profound significance. It provides a robust legislative foundation for the expansion of the effectiveness of commercial arbitration agreements and marks a new phase in the development of arbitration in China. This study takes principal and guarantee contracts as a point of departure to delve into the jurisprudential basis for the extension of arbitration agreements from principal contracts to guarantee contracts. By doing so, it aims to offer a comprehensive and nuanced understanding of the essence and scope of arbitration agreements, thereby laying a solid theoretical groundwork for the further development of arbitration.

https://doi.org/10.70693/itphss.v2i1.178
pdf

References

Lin, B. Q. (2008). Theoretical and empirical research on the expansion of the arbitration agreement' s effect (Doctoral dissertation). China University of Political Science and Law.

Liu, X. H. (2004). On the theoretical basis of the expansion of the arbitration agreement' s effect. Beijing Arbitration, 1, 51-61.

Arbitration Law of the People' s Republic of China (Revised Draft), Article 24. In cases where disputes involve both the principal contract and the ancillary contract, if the arbitration agreements in the principal and ancillary contracts are inconsistent, the terms of the principal contract shall prevail. If the ancillary contract does not contain an arbitration agreement, the arbitration agreement in the principal contract shall be binding on the parties to the ancillary contract.

Phillips, J. F. (1988). Arbitration law, practice, and precedents (p. 5). ICSA Publishing.

Cheng, D. (2006). Feasibility analysis of recognizing implied arbitration agreements in China. Arbitration Studies, 4, 9-14.

Li, Z. (2003). On the validity of arbitration clauses in foreign-related civil and commercial contracts. Southeast Academic Review, 6, 92-97.

Shen, D. M. (Ed.). (1993). Introduction to English and American contract law (p. 205). Foreign Trade Education Press.

Dong, A. S., et al. (Trans.). (1992). British commercial law (p. 175). Law Press.

Gui, Y. (2020). The expansion of the arbitration agreement's effect and its determination. People' s Justice, 5, 70-74.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Yiyang Ma (Author)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.