Abstract
Purpose: With the continuous improvement of higher education penetration in China, college students group scale is also expanding, at the same time, lag behind, unable to adapt to the teaching situation of the learning student group is more and more large. This study examines how text genre and topic familiarity influence reading choices among college English students facing learning challenges.
Approach: A total of 20 participants participated in this study (boys: n=9,18.85 ± 1.35 years old), Eyelink 1000plus device was used, participants freely scanned the articles on the screen and answered the corresponding questions to ensure that they had a comprehensive understanding of the content of the article. Four indexes of fixation duration, fixation counts, average fixation duration and average pupil size were analyzed.
Results: The findings indicate that: 1) Students with learning challenges exhibit superior performance on expository texts compared to narrative and argumentative ones, with significantly reduced fixation duration and count on expository texts versus the other genres (p < 0.05); 2) These students demonstrate enhanced reading efficiency on English texts with known topics compared to those with unknown topics, characterized by notably lower fixation duration and frequency (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: In light of these results, we propose the adoption of differentiated instruction, proceeding incrementally within the English curriculum to select suitable reading materials for students with learning challenges, aiming to enhance their reading proficiency and ameliorate their academic standing.
References
Atef-Vahid, S., Maftoon, P., & Zahedi, K. (2013). Topic familiarity, passage sight vocabulary, and L2 lexical inferencing: An investigation in the iranian EFL context. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrsll.2012.216
Bernhardt, E. 1983. Three approaches to reading comprehension in intermediate German. Modern Language Journal 67(2):111-115. https://doi.org/111⁃115.10.2307/328281
Burton, C. & M. Daneman. 2007. Compensating for a limited working capacity during reading:Evidence from eye movements. Reading Psychology 28(2): https://doi.org/163⁃186.10.1080/02702710601186407
Carrell, P. 1983. Three components of background knowledge in reading comprehension. Language Learning 33(2): 183-207. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1983.tb00534.x
Carver, R.(1992). Effect of prediction activities, prior knowledge, and text type upon amount comprehended: Using reading theory to critique schema theory research. Reading Research Quarterly, 27(2): 165-174.
Ceylan, M., & Baydık, B. (2018). Examination of reading skills of students who are poor readers in different text genres. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 13(2), 178-191. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v13i2.3119
Choi, Y. D., & Chung, Y. R. (2019). Book review: Eye-tracking: A Guide for Applied Linguistics Research. Language Testing, 37(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532219863661
Cui, G., Wang, Y., & Zhong, X. (2020). The Effects of Suprasegmental Phonological Training on English Reading Comprehension: Evidence from Chinese EFL Learners. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, (4),1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-020-09743-2
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods, 39(2), 175-191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
Freed, E., S. Hamilton & D. Long. 2017. Comprehension in proficient readers: The nature of individual variation. Journal of Memory and Language 97(1) :135-153: https://doi.org/135⁃153.10.1016/j.jml.2017.07.008
Goodman, & Kenneth, S. (1967). Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game. Journal of the Reading Specialist, 6(4), 126-135. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388076709556976
Gu, Q.Y., &Chen, F. (2020). Influence of Working Memory Capacity and L2 Proficiency on Reading Comprehension of Familiar and Unfamiliar Topics. Modern Foreign Languages (Bimonthly), 43(5),705-717.
Jung, J. 2018. Effects of task complexity and working memory capacity on L2 reading comprehension. System, 74(1): 21-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.02.005
Kirk, S. A., & Bateman, B. (1962). Diagnosis and Remediation of Learning Disabilities. Exceptional Children, 29(2), 73-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440296202900204
Kirk, & W., D. (1975). The Relationship of Reading Disabilities to Learning Disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 9(2), 133-137. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246697500900204
Lee, J. (2020). Task closure and task complexity effects on L2 written performance. Journal of Second Language Writing, 50(4), 100777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100777
Li,S.(2013).Significance of discourse comprehension in English reading instruction. Overseas English,(19):276-277.
Liu, Y.Y. (2011). Theoretical Frameworks for English Vocabulary Learning — Cognitive Processing Levels Theory. Study Theory, 8, 169-170.
Ma, F. (2021). Causal Factors of Low Achievement in EFL Development: Findings from a Chinese University. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 12(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1201.06
Mohamedi-Amaruch A, Rico-Martin A M.(2020). Assessment of reading comprehension in primary education: Reading processes and texts. Lenguas Modernas, 55: 37-52.
Panico, J., & Healey, E. C. (2009). Influence of Text Type, Topic Familiarity, and Stuttering Frequency on Listener Recall, Comprehension, and Mental Effort. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52(2),534-536. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2008/07-0238)
Pulido, D. (2010). Modeling the role of second language proficiency and topic familiarity in second language incidental vocabulary acquisition through reading. Language Learning, 53(2), 233-284. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00217
Pillai, P, Ayare, Y P, Balasingam, B, et al.(2020). Response time and eye tracking datasets for activities demanding varying cognitive load. Data in Brief,33,106389-106400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2020.106389
Rayner, K. (1995). Eye movements and cognitive processes in reading, visual search, and scene perception. Studies in Visual Information Processing, 6(3), 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0926-907x(05)80003-0
Reis, S. M., & Mccoach, D. B. (2016). The Underachievement of Gifted Students: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go? Gifted Child Quarterly, 44(3), 3. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620004400302
Shakourzadeh, L., & Izadpanah, S. (2020). Textbook-assigned and self-selected topics of Iranian male EFL learners: Topic interest, topic familiarity, topic importance, and topic difficulty. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-020-00099-7
Shi, Q.Y. & Zhou, Y.,Y. (2023). The Impact of Vocabulary Density in Second Language Reading on Incidental Vocabulary Acquisition. English Square, 2, 129-132. https://doi.org/10.16723/j.cnki.yygc.2023.02.030
Wang A.P., Chen,S.H., Shu, H.(2005).The Study on the Effects of Content Familiarity of Cultural Feature on English
Reading Comprehension in the Conditions of Different Difficulty of the Reading Material.Psychology Exploration, (03):28-32. https://doi.org/EP1866247 B1
Snow, C. (2003). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension[M]. RAND Corporation.
Yan, G. L., Xiong, J.P., Zang,C. L.(2013).Review of Eye-movement Measures in Reading Research.Advances in Psychological Science,21(04):589-605.
Zhang, D., X., Jukka, Hyn, Cui,L. et al. (2019). Effects of task instructions and topic signaling on text processing among adult readers with different reading styles: An eye-tracking study. Learning and Instruction, 64, 101246-101246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101246
Zhang, D., X., Jukka, Hyn, Cui,L. et al. (2019). Effects of task instructions and topic signaling on text processing among adult readers with different reading styles: An eye-tracking study. Learning and Instruction, 64, 101246-101246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101246
Zhong, Y. & Xie, S.Y.(2020).Research on Students’ Mental Folding Levels Based on Tasks with Different Cognitive Demand. Journal of Mathematics Education, 29(3),25-31.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Huan Qi, Zhaoyan Meng, Yujing Dang, Yanni Xu, Meirong Yang (Author)